Vision is partly seeing where the blind are yet to see. Vision is not just about the ‘future’, but the possible present or realizable near future. None of us had verifiable huge vision in our first year or first five years, so the first to see may not necessarily see the farthest or longest. If we can identify one to three things that will help us all, then what percentage will agree on all three are helpful, which two, or which one to work on, or endlessly debate on; or worse to debate on only our differences? Agreeing also has levels, because the poorest folks should not wait on the richest folks or anyone to contribute where need be. What percentage of governments, companies, or individuals would have acted if this marvellous article was published on New York Times, Washington post, CNN etc? Is it the responsibility of world leaders to enact a system of global fishing of great ideas? We had globalization of fun oriented fishing to the realization of Olympics, World Cup football (soccer), etc.
Decades after was the word ‘globalization’ coined or frequented to mean a fraction of questionable trade, but what is trade in respect to work? One of the branches or sub-branches. Ok, globalization of learning or needed inventions in particular is yet to meaningfully occur, let alone in fair game. The Internet is the under-utilized and feared blessing, where positive competitions lack even among media houses to subdue questionable world leaders? Partnerships should have systems or formulas, or the brain drain will be partly stealing and partly torture? A leap on Batteries, leap on Cameras, and a leap on Air-crafts are the top three needed inventions, where every country should spend millions and awards be on Billions and bigger than Grammys, Nobel Peace Prizes, world cup, etc?
Batteries: Batteries are the under researched jewel in the world of energy. Creating Batteries that will last for decades with one charge is feasible within months, but the pessimists will disagree. Energy generation and energy storage are the two main categories of energy. If you count five to ten forms of energy generation, what percentage will go to direct consumption vs storage through batteries? The most ideal is batteries that can generate energy, but a huge leap on energy storage may be more modification of hemp batteries, modifications in nuclear batteries, or something humans are yet to know. Regardless of what you think, those who seek and fund knowledge are more deserving to benefit from knowledge than those who pray and ignore essential responsibilities.
The weird reality of our so-called globalization is some people are not given the fair chance to even fund what or who may benefit them and humankind? Many of us can tell you who are the top footballers, runners, etc of Africa and we indirectly fund them. Myself and most people cannot tell you the top three African countries or African companies that are researching on Batteries, aspiring, or already achieved what level in that regard. Without knowing, how can I directly help fund such, after knowing indirect funding may not be enough, often bureaucratic, and sometimes too corrupt for the best minds.
Recently, I wrote a piece on the importance of crowd investing over the present crowd funding to realize essential projects. I think that is easily achievable, but if you have hundreds of companies or individuals researching on batteries, how will you choose which one to fund? Ultimate Achievements become the most essential focus over the country of birth or residence. It is not guaranteed that only companies with small direct achievements will make the ultimate achievements of decades lasting batteries as example. The sales pitch is one thing, but the honesty level of the aspiring researchers may determine where I donate or invest most. So here is my $50 crowd investment to a Chinese or xyz company, because the Chinese government assures me 20 years or death penalty to those who corruptly abuse my funds; here is my $50 investment to a Nigerian or xyz company because they agree to diversify employees based on merit and work under cameras to ascertain real research than chit-chatting as norm, regardless of weak or strong Nigerian or xyz government laws and policies? Here is my $25 for the most trusted Gambian company, because it is my country of birth, you may win or the best among you can co-work with the Nigerian or xyz company based on merit. Now I want to just donate one to five dollars to battery companies around the world, on the remaining $75 as example. Two hundred dollars on battery research means believing in learning (ihqrah) and patience versus two hundred dollars on Batteries that others funded the research on… How many of us spend lot more than two hundred dollars on batteries per year, but how much of that is for research, by choice and not resort choice? Some spend that much on weekly low sex, marabouts, praise singers, clothes, alcohol, transportation fees, etc. No, we are not judging, but percentage matters, and even the average person in poor Gambia can donate one dollar on battery research, but we have to create the trust worthy conditions and feasibility to donate without present credit cards.
Cameras: The evolution of cameras is very interesting. Although security cameras, including body cameras will be my main focus, will poking historical satire help? It was long after the death of prophet Muhhahm^mahd (pbuh), some Christians or Atheists claim research (ihqrah) is so vital, we may make cameras and sell to Muslims who refuse funding research? So the questionable girls of the world will use pictures to bait Jarga and how many men? Around 1966, a black woman, Marie Van Brittan Brown, in the u.s was the first to make security cameras, before Whites and Chinese say we will invest on its research than Africans and make Africans pay as customers or submitters? Ok! Only the blacks or xyz who will invest or donate to camera research deserve to benefit or have bragging rights.
There is a difference between direct and indirect support, including cameras. So I urge everyone who truly cares about security to go buy cameras, and a company may delay bankruptcy, make pennies, or five dollar profit to invest how much on further research? That is indirect support. When that same company or ten rising better ones receive one dollar each from you as donation to research, what percentage of them will use it for research and succeed in which ways? Regardless of your chosen companies, the Lord of security may accept it as ‘charity for security and love of ihqrah or knowledge seekers’, then assign angels as your guardian , or turn you to become Angel instead of animal, when you die?
Although I own a body camera that I under-utilized — you can blame me, see I am ahead in supporting a crucial company/industry, or ask why I under-utilize it? The present body cameras require frequent re-charging similar to phones, so if you forget to charge it, you cannot use it when you remember at the last minute. Aha! Now you know decade lasting batteries will mean security than the billions government waste on weapons. So if you have two camera companies as option and one donates to battery research than the other, then you know which one to buy from. With present cameras and their limitations, we have benefited from capturing abusive cops, but was it racists that funded the research than potential victims? We capture war crimes in Ukraine and Gaza, so you wonder why guilty politicians and journalists are yet to agree on how a culture of cameras will help and urge for its funding and embracing by civilians than governments. If Saudi Arabia or xyz donated one hundred million dollars worth of Cameras with solar or xyz chargers to Gaza, how will it help compare to how they pay one sportsperson two hundred million dollars per year? No! I am not anti sport, but the monies we spend on the needy masses and research vs fun oriented payments are testimonies that even seeing humans cannot ignore, let alone Angels of God. They can claim thinking came late, but who is deaf in arrogance, or dumb in censorship? Refusing to share the truth is a crime, but if you misunderstand or disagree with five percent of the wordings, fear or arrogance may make you dumb?
Air-crafts: These bulky air crafts we use to transport people are super obsolete; the bulky and expensive upcoming flying cars are not my favorite. We need to fly one by one, or maximum two in over 90% of air travel. It may sound strange, but it is the desirable feasible near future that the blind cannot see, but will they refuse to even fund the optimistic under fraud-free research regulations. Many of us pay thousands of dollars a year to fly, but can we directly invest or donate towards better ways of flying? Similar to the battery break down example, we should gladly invest and donate beyond our countries and continents, but as one race.
There are many methods of powering small air crafts we can use, but will decade lasting batteries help most on air travel? My point is to support various companies and their chosen methods, but the ones that invest or donate to battery research should be honored more. The future is flying, but top governments and companies may not like it. Who are they to stop us if God reveals the knowledge to the fearless great minds? All their excuses will be subdued. Like birds train for days to fly, humans can conquer how to fly within hours, some days, some weeks in a very safe environment and rigorous tests before the allowing on where we will all share. Since the crafts will be much smaller, we will not need airports to land, or air support communications, except in rare emergencies. It is hard to explain to small minds now, but I can assure you it is possible within months, because a big chunk of the knowledge is here, including myself. Like the Juts Quhr-aahn was doubted by many; I struggled on the estimated timeline, but I have finally produced it, available in the Gambia. I am trying to have it worldwide, but Amazon is having my account on ‘temporal hold’ on silly suspicions. They will ultimately allow me, or I use other companies or relatives. My point is achievements do come where many least expect it. Since the Quhr-aahn is a widely known book, there cannot be any cheating. The mere fact that there are no challenges so far is like an affirmation on accuracy and unprecedented features.
Global Competition Mindset is vital everywhere, but more-so in Africa. I am not interested in supporting an African Company who wants to under copy the West or Asia as an example. I want you to think about camera features that are yet to exist, then we can outperform their companies. Otherwise, I rather support winners, even if it means supporting Angels or Aliens over certain humans who prefer funding wars upon questionable wars. May God help us beyond words and bless us Through Showlove Trinity: Let’s learn, let’s work, let’s have Fun.
Optional note:
Imagine a crowd investing website based on categories and regions. Myself and millions of Africans, westerners, etc will gladly invest or donate if reasonable transparency are guaranteed. My top three are well known, but I happen to know how to build sea-bus, despite seeing the Gambia going through terrible ferry problems for years. So if they refuse to trust me, Gambians may crowd invest on me, or I may invest on A Ghanaian or rising u.s Company that is trusted more. Whether or not such company partners with me, sea-buses can be lot cheaper and more efficient than the millions we buy from Ukraine and others. I believe in flying over sea-bus, but you sometimes have to work with what you have or offered.
Suppose ten different companies offer the ability to build sea-buses for the Gambia, should we focus on one or only the established ones? Well, the best may not have any money. So it makes sense to support building sea-van first, or speed ambulance boat, and governments can do fund matching on only things that interest them.
Every government is not just spending lots on the mentioned three, but must ask why their predecessors never invested in such research. Blaming than praising your predecessors is one thing to force you on a challenge: how much are you spending on such research, directly and indirectly? Are you buying shares in the companies you believe will succeed on air crafts than Jarga? I know batteries are much more important, but I am yet to be given special knowledge on improving batteries like air crafts. A friend asked me if I have a proto-type of my air-craft ideas? Sometimes you do not have to reveal what you have, or the ungrateful will steal it. So work on what you can until you have enough money or are trusted enough on crowd investing/funding. You can then reveal it to such as calculated gamble.
Suppose the AU was of much good, they would have identified about three things they want African governments, companies, and people should research on per year. Poor Gambia Government can be tasked with million dollars per mentioned and the more populous Nigeria Twenty million dollars per mentioned. Each government can raise it through taxes or openly call for crowd funding/investing. Only fifty percent of the tasked amount will go to the AU selected rotating countries. Meaning about one and a half million dollars will go to AU from the Gambia, and a similar amount retained for Gambia level research. Nigeria will offer thirty million dollars to AU and retain thirty million. A short sighted Nigerian may claim unfair, but for how long with education and a great system? Suppose the AU figure amounts to three billion dollars as a rough example, and Nigeria wins the ‘battery one’ through a rotating raffle — it means Nigeria wins one billion dollars to research on batteries, raising their prospects. We will demand any Nigerian company receiving over one million dollars must hire at least 25% of its workforce/research force from participating countries; then you may hire Chinese, Japanese, or xyz citizens you deem crucial. This will force Morocco , Senegal, or xyz to join that part of the AU partnership. If Guinea with five million outperforms Nigeria on Batteries, then should we blame Nigeria, help Guinea on mass production, or wait to see where Nigeria may do better? Small Gambia retained half a million per mentioned, but happens to win a billion dollar AU rotating fund for Air-crafts By hiring the best of Nigerians, Ghananians, etc Jarga or another Gambian can shock the world and make Tesla, Ford, and xyz go bankrupt? You think that is far-fetched, how much of that money will truly go to waste, some form of achievements, or more knowledge and short employment for how many Africans+? Bad rules will not state transport vehicles or air crafts, but insist on cars, that Africans cannot work on air crafts? Again, the half a million dollars for the Gambia on cameras can be raised to three million dollars through crowd funding or special AU minimum rules. Both a camera research and manufacturing company in the Gambia may outperform Ghana or xyz that won billion dollar on cameras. My point is money helps on research, elections, etc but having the most money does not guarantee win or highest win. All good knowledge comes from God for further testing. Good to great character is the most probable way of attracting such knowledge, from the God of character+.
So do hire formally educated folks, but establish systems for great character for a company or government to succeed. Make room for proven thinkers, whether or not they have high formal credentials. Avoid corruption, and embrace culture of cameras, especially in public places and most workplaces.
How many PhD holders in government or AU level cannot think or echo me on such? Some may say their white masters will not allow them? Even Ecowas level can carry out such Agreements/partnership. Three to ten countries can start it and others may join quickly. How many media houses can write better editorials, have prime time hours discussions, and strong interviews to make it happen? The worst in the cabinet will oppose it with excuses that can be easily bought by non-thinkers, but conquered by the fearless thinkers? How many in the diaspora will work on its realization vs donating and investing if AU or ECOWAS gets involved?
BLAME VS DONATE/INVEST: It is not hard to find one million Africans in the Diaspora, ready to blame the AU or their respective countries, but how hard it is to find one to ten million Africans ready to donate one to ten dollars for Africa’s research and development (R&D)? How about one to ten million Africans to invest one hundred dollars, one thousand or more dollars in reasonably transparent R&D oriented companies and universities projects? I suspect it is easier to find those who fund back ways or illegal immigration to Europe, but that does not mean refusing to try or few thousands will not gladly raise billions of dollars.
Globalization first meant parading semi-naked women per country to work money, or for Trump to get a wife, while no girl love me yet? Am I jealous, or globalization means New York times+ refusing to seek best top writers at modern Ghana, xyz, or Africa wide to re-publish at least three articles, per week, they consider greater than their Trump bashing articles? Or does it mean partnership where Modern Ghana or xyz get to select the articles instead of questionable New York times fearing this will uplift Africa to the point of having media houses bigger than New York times and CNN? Or globalization mean to fetch and pay world sports folks more, so that money worshipping Africans will focus on sports, and say why is s/he poor if if s/he is so intelligent? If you live around people who under value intelligence, you won’t be honored, they may back bite you, and you may be hunted unless God loves you than Julian Assange or even Snowden. I know the FBI, NSA, etc will have dedicated folks to monitor Modern Ghana and every major African media house, but does Newyork Times, London Times, Etc have dedicated folks to check the best or worst of African writers? They may prefer the conformists, so let us have African choose per category. People will love or hate you over intelligence, truth, or kindness.
Jarga kebba Gigo.
An Activist and Transformer.
